Search Forums
Navigation bar
Forum Shortcuts

Battlefield: Bad Company 2; better than Modern Warfare 2???

 
 
Battlefield: Bad Company 2; better than Modern Warfare 2???
01-25-2010 7:20 PM by ZitterZap. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Not Ranked
Posts 34
guitarthing111 Posted: 01-25-2010 5:10 PM

I've been hearing a lot about Bad Company 2. It sounds pretty awesome to me, considering it has even more advanced graphics and destructible environments than before. I am not, however, convinced that it will forever bury COD:MW2 into the ground. I have spoken to people who think it will though. I'm curious to hear what you all think.

Will BF:BC2 top COD:MW2 in terms of entertainment? I other words, which is gonna be more fun?

PS- these sequels have messed up names.

-Use their search engine, get paid.

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,290

I think it comes down to personal preference really, but I personally like the Battlefield games more.

I have been playing BC1 for a few months now as I wait for MW2 to come, and it is a blast.  I also tried out the BC2 beta, and dug it a lot.

I don't think it will bury MW2, but I think I will like BC2 more.

Its similar to the Madden / NFL 2K matchup a few years back before EA got exclusive NFL rights.  I liked the 2K gameplay more, but Madden just had market saturation and a lot of EA $$$ behind it.

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 13,687
BetaTestersGoozex_ClanGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-ViralGoozex

It's likely not going to beat MW2 in terms of sales, at least not on the console end.  The hype train on the PC side is running a lot harder than on the consoles, though PS3 gamers have reason to be pumped after playing the beta.  However, MW2's hype train was out of control, coming from a killer game before it.  BC1 I've only heard mixed things about, so some may be a bit more hesitant to jump right into BC2 like they did MW2.

Comparing the two is a bit apples to oranges though really.   All CODs are really just hyped up Quakes and UTs; fast based action, little to no down time, not much in the way of tactics and teamplay is generally optional; often forgotten in favor of personal glory.  BF games are generally the opposite; teamplay is far more important, battles are a bit more meaningful and drawn out, tactics are relevant, maps larger, etc.  Though BC2 is a little watered down compared to the rest of the BF franchise, it should be huge nonetheless.

I love both franchises, but the BF series has always made me feel more like I'm in a warzone instead of just a war based arena.  Your squad of friends, and once in a while even just you, can make a game changing difference depending on your actions.  In more frantic shooters like MW, it's mostly about getting the highest score possible by any means, team be damned.  As a result, personally I know I'm going to get more play time out of BC2 than MW2, a game that has already had it's longevity questioned.

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 827

kenny summed it up just right

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 728

I haven't played MW2. But I felt BC2 beta has much better game mechanics than BC1.

BC1 had a fun campaign but I didn't find the multiplayer interesting. No kill cam also and the graphics were not great(720p) so you always had trouble spotting enemies.

BC2 beta was much better than BC1 multiplayer.

Also I always play a sniper so I am already getting biased towards BC2.

Previous | Next | RSS Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
 
 
About Goozex
About
Contact us
Advertise
Supporters
Site areas
Games
Movies
Forums
Toolbox
API
Cards
Help and Support
How it works
FAQ
Help
What's new
Announcements
RSS
In the news
Updates

Copyright © 2006-2010 Goozex, Inc. - All rights reserved - Patent pending
Game db © 2006-10 Rovi, Inc. - For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved.