Search Forums
Navigation bar
Forum Shortcuts

Follow up on neutral feedback thread with poll.

 
 
Follow up on neutral feedback thread with poll.
03-19-2010 1:09 PM by Kenny007. 23 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (24 items) 1 2 Next >

This post has 23 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 356
ilovetrading Posted: 03-15-2009 11:50 AM

This is bassicly continuing the discussion on the thread about neutral feedback.

My personal opininion is that this is rediculous, someone should change this immediately. If someone sends you something with something missing, the buyer faces the consequences, and the seller gains from it. The only thing the seller gets is bad feedback, so he can live. On the other hand, the disgruntled buyer must wait the extra time in line for his game to be requested, and he doesn't enjoy any of the extra accesories that should've came with the game. hopefully more people agree with me on this matter and vote in favor of the buyer.

Do you think the neutral feedback rules should be edited in some way.

  • NO, I perfectly agree with Goozex on this one. (13.3%)
  • No, but I think one or two things could be changed to better the trading process. (43.3%)
  • Yes, they need to take out neutrals and just give a negative, if you don't get what you ask for you didn't get anything! (35%)
  • YEA, and if in a year this rule doesn't change i'll most likely be leaving Goozex! (8.3%)
  • Total Votes: 60

<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/DudeOnStilts.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>

Top 100 Contributor
Posts 967

ilovetrading:

This is bassicly continuing the discussion on the thread about neutral feedback.

My personal opininion is that this is rediculous, someone should change this immediately. If someone sends you something with something missing, the buyer faces the consequences, and the seller gains from it. The only thing the seller gets is bad feedback, so he can live. On the other hand, the disgruntled buyer must wait the extra time in line for his game to be requested, and he doesn't enjoy any of the extra accesories that should've came with the game. hopefully more people agree with me on this matter and vote in favor of the buyer.

I think that the only time you should get points back is if it's a periphial bundle and you recieve disc and manual only.

If you order a game that's just a normal disc case and manual then maybe you could get like 50 points back or so.

Gaming Signature

 

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,751
Goozex-MegaPosterGoozex-ViralGoozex

dafitzanator777:

ilovetrading:

This is bassicly continuing the discussion on the thread about neutral feedback.

My personal opininion is that this is rediculous, someone should change this immediately. If someone sends you something with something missing, the buyer faces the consequences, and the seller gains from it. The only thing the seller gets is bad feedback, so he can live. On the other hand, the disgruntled buyer must wait the extra time in line for his game to be requested, and he doesn't enjoy any of the extra accesories that should've came with the game. hopefully more people agree with me on this matter and vote in favor of the buyer.

I think that the only time you should get points back is if it's a periphial bundle and you recieve disc and manual only.

If you order a game that's just a normal disc case and manual then maybe you could get like 50 points back or so.

I agree. For games like Guitar Hero III, if you pay 1000 points and don't get the guitar, that sucks. Same if you get a collectors edition and there are no extras with it. You might as well have gotten the regular version for less points.

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 356

yeah and thats bassicly what i'm mad about. i got a trade without the peripheral and never got compinsated, and had to spend my money to ship it out, and wasted a trade credit. lucky me right?

so obviously this needs to be changed only 16.7 % of people disagree so far.

<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/DudeOnStilts.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 356

wow so goozex is gonna lose 18% of its members if they don't change this rule....might wanna hop on this g-team

<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/DudeOnStilts.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 11,578
BetaTestersGoozex AVGoozex_ClanGoozex-GoozcastGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozexModerator

ilovetrading:

wow so goozex is gonna lose 18% of its members if they don't change this rule....might wanna hop on this g-team

As of 9 PM est only 3 out of 17 users have said they would leave. It seems doubtful that you could say that 18%, or more precisely 17.6% of ALL Goozers would leave based on such a small sample size. Good try though.

 

Goozex Forum Moderator

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,353

ilovetrading:

wow so goozex is gonna lose 18% of its members if they don't change this rule....might wanna hop on this g-team

18% of the people that voted does not equal 18% of the members.

And after my vote it is only 16.7%.

 

Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,136
Goozex-MegaPosterGoozex-ViralGoozex

I agree with Mafafu and Zack21 you messed up big time on your percents. You should re-take 8th Grade Math.

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 923
Goozex_ClanGoozex-ViralGoozex

Offered in protest:

This poll thread seems to me to be more a petition than a poll.  It greets me as biased because it does nothing to explain the current system or even link to the original thread it refers to, forcing those who haven't been following to either go looking for it with the oft unused search engine or guess at what is meant.  This reduces the sampling of the 'middle' opinion.  Furthermore, it draws a conclusion after a sampling of 7 hours, not allowing time for people to actually respond.

I think that you are going to have to be far more neutral if you want to inspire a change based on a poll.  Otherwise, you are better off writing an argument and asking for signatures.

I'm not going to weigh in with an opinion on neutral feedback here.  Just this protest to the manner in which it was delivered.  I don't feel like offering an honest response either way is really what you are after, but rather your points back for a specific trade gone sour.

In sincerety, I feel bad for your situation.  It certainly isn't fair that somebody didn't send you what you requested.

Respectfully,

naytk

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 5,300
BetaTestersGoozex AVGoozex_ClanGoozex-GoozcastGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-SigCreatorGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozex

To piggyback off naytk's comment, you really shouldn't give your fervent opinion, or any opinion, in the OP of a poll.

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 484

ilovetrading:

NO, I perfectly agree with Goozex on this one.

 I don't know what "this one" is or what you are referring to, so I can't rightfully post an option in the poll. Very ambiguous post.

I have brought to light a monstrous abnormality, but I did it for the sake of knowledge. Now for the sake of all life and Nature you must help me thrust it back into the dark again.

H.P. Lovecraft
"The Case of Charles Dexter Ward"

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 5,966
Goozex AVGoozex-GoozcastGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozexModerator

... that is because it is more of a rant ...

Like many things, I don't think the answer is black & white.  For example, not getting a manual for a DS game is very different from not getting the rumble pack for Metroid Prime Pinball.

-- Mike

Catch my stuff at GearDiary,com!

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 10,787
BetaTestersGoozex AVGoozex_ClanGoozex-GoozcastGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozex

for those of you who answered "i will leave goozex" good riddance

Pizza guys are getting worse and worse looking. I guess all the good ones went into porn.

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 356

sorry that i posted such a biased post...I was just trying to get the debate/discussion started. and obviously 90% of people that voted say that there need to be some aspect of neutral feedback changed. so it is obviously flawed. I understand statistics and the reason my numbers were different is because over time more people voted and it changed the %'s. I win.

<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/DudeOnStilts.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 484

What is it you "win" exactly? I wasn't aware there was a competition going on.

I have brought to light a monstrous abnormality, but I did it for the sake of knowledge. Now for the sake of all life and Nature you must help me thrust it back into the dark again.

H.P. Lovecraft
"The Case of Charles Dexter Ward"

Previous | Next | RSS Page 1 of 2 (24 items) 1 2 Next >
 
 
About Goozex
About
Contact us
Advertise
Supporters
Site areas
Games
Movies
Forums
Toolbox
API
Cards
Help and Support
How it works
FAQ
Help
What's new
Announcements
RSS
In the news
Updates

Copyright © 2006-2010 Goozex, Inc. - All rights reserved - Patent pending
Game db © 2006-10 Rovi, Inc. - For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved.