Search Forums
Navigation bar
Forum Shortcuts

The system should never match you with someone you have an unresolved dispute with

 
 
The system should never match you with someone you have an unresolved dispute with
03-17-2010 10:00 PM by slushersa. 8 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (9 items)

rated by 0 users
This post has 8 Replies | 3 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 13
dbenoy Posted: 03-16-2010 5:43 PM

This just happened to me.  I don't think it's appropriate.

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,588
Goozex_ClanGoozex-MegaPoster

Wow, that is actually an appropriate suggestion. I personally haven't seen it before, but I think you just did something that is quite rare.

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 11,578
BetaTestersGoozex AVGoozex_ClanGoozex-GoozcastGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozexModerator

That is a good suggestion. I am not sure how easy this would be to implement, but I will pass it along to the higher ups.

Goozex Forum Moderator

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,886
BetaTestersGoozex_ClanGoozex-MegaPosterGoozex-VeteranGoozex-ViralGoozex

..........................

Akwaaaarrrrdd....... Huh?

Top 150 Contributor
Posts 827

lol that sucks

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,273
Goozex-MegaPosterGoozex-ViralGoozex

This may be a good idea, but who gets skipped? 

Top 100 Contributor
Posts 1,105
Goozex AV

I hate suggestions that start to mess around with people's positions in the queue. If you're first in line as a buyer and they're first as a seller, you should be matched up.

But this seems like a very logical exception. I don't imagine it's a very common occurance, but I can see it potentially causing serious problems for the few times it does. If there is a feasible way to do this, I think they should.

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,235
Goozex AVGoozex-MegaPoster

I can see that this could be very useful 99.9 % of the time. The problem with this is If I was a buyer and got into a dispute because of a lame reason that could be easily fixed I wouldnt want the slight possibility to get skipped on something else that I could possibly be waiting months for like certain full anime sets or a rare game just because I was in an unrelated dispute - of course the odds of that happening are also very slim - but thats usually how my luck works. 

Gaming Signature

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,273
Goozex-MegaPosterGoozex-ViralGoozex

larpi:

I can see that this could be very useful 99.9 % of the time. The problem with this is If I was a buyer and got into a dispute because of a lame reason that could be easily fixed I wouldnt want the slight possibility to get skipped on something else that I could possibly be waiting months for like certain full anime sets or a rare game just because I was in an unrelated dispute - of course the odds of that happening are also very slim - but thats usually how my luck works. 

This is why^

Think if the game was lost in the mail, dispute window was open only to extend the trade window, so after you think of all the possibilities it is correct to get matched up with the same person,  another point is everyone is here to save money if there was a problem with the first trade the seller should/would make sure to correct any discrepencies the 2nd go round.

Previous | Next | RSS Page 1 of 1 (9 items)
 
 
About Goozex
About
Contact us
Advertise
Supporters
Site areas
Games
Movies
Forums
Toolbox
API
Cards
Help and Support
How it works
FAQ
Help
What's new
Announcements
RSS
In the news
Updates

Copyright © 2006-2010 Goozex, Inc. - All rights reserved - Patent pending
Game db © 2006-10 Rovi, Inc. - For personal non-commercial use only. All rights reserved.