Renaissance 2K: Did anybody else notice this morning that the re-styled buttons on the front page said "Requests Queque" and "Offers Queque"? As in, Requests QQ and Offers QQ? I swear. I'm not clever enough to make this stuff up.
Did anybody else notice this morning that the re-styled buttons on the front page said "Requests Queque" and "Offers Queque"?
As in, Requests QQ and Offers QQ?
I swear. I'm not clever enough to make this stuff up.
It has since been fixed, but yeah, the transition was rough rough.
-- Mike
Catch my stuff at GearDiary,com!
dtp11: kevlar51: I-Weapon-X: dtp11: So far, only 12 of 110 people said they were completely opposed to the point cap change. because shortly into the poll a more reasonable option was offered Yep. I'd be fine with limiting the cap to rares and otherwise expensive boxsets/LEs etc We should re-do the poll now that people might/should have a better understanding of why the higher cap is a good thing!
kevlar51: I-Weapon-X: dtp11: So far, only 12 of 110 people said they were completely opposed to the point cap change. because shortly into the poll a more reasonable option was offered Yep. I'd be fine with limiting the cap to rares and otherwise expensive boxsets/LEs etc
I-Weapon-X: dtp11: So far, only 12 of 110 people said they were completely opposed to the point cap change. because shortly into the poll a more reasonable option was offered
dtp11: So far, only 12 of 110 people said they were completely opposed to the point cap change.
So far, only 12 of 110 people said they were completely opposed to the point cap change.
because shortly into the poll a more reasonable option was offered
Yep. I'd be fine with limiting the cap to rares and otherwise expensive boxsets/LEs etc
but essentially people still arent a fan of a general cap, only a limited cap is what this implies
On anther note, the poll is baddly worded. It should read are you for or aganst, because you can care about the point change and be for it.
I-Weapon-X: dtp11: We should re-do the poll now that people might/should have a better understanding of why the higher cap is a good thing! but essentially people still arent a fan of a general cap, only a limited cap is what this implies
dtp11: We should re-do the poll now that people might/should have a better understanding of why the higher cap is a good thing!
We should re-do the poll now that people might/should have a better understanding of why the higher cap is a good thing!
Drkirby: On anther note, the poll is baddly worded. It should read are you for or aganst, because you can care about the point change and be for it.
dtp11: I-Weapon-X: dtp11: We should re-do the poll now that people might/should have a better understanding of why the higher cap is a good thing! but essentially people still arent a fan of a general cap, only a limited cap is what this implies Only a new (properly worded) poll will tell! Drkirby: On anther note, the poll is baddly worded. It should read are you for or aganst, because you can care about the point change and be for it. I agree... gotta love semantics!
Killmak, make it so!
Before the massive derail, I mentioned that I don't think new releases should be allowed to go over 1000 points. Does anybody feel the same about that or are you guys alright with paying GameStop-like prices for newer games?
Join the Folding@Home Goozex team: Team Goozex #80197
JoeCamNet: Before the massive derail, I mentioned that I don't think new releases should be allowed to go over 1000 points. Does anybody feel the same about that or are you guys alright with paying GameStop-like prices for newer games?
Depends on demand. If we're talking a AAA game with hundreds of requests (looks back at the madness that was the Resident Evil 5 release night massacre-fest), then yes, I would approve and I would dish out 1100 points for a copy within the first couple weeks after release.
The majority of new releases with moderate/low requests shouldn't be pushed up above 1000 points IMO. If they were over 1000 points, I would just leave them on hold and wouldn't consider trading for them.
Goozex Forum Moderator
I didn't know Gamestop allowed you to buy games with Goozex points...
*nom nom nom*
The winner is clear and Goozex needs to listen to it's users.
Renaissance 2K: JoeCamNet: Before the massive derail, I mentioned that I don't think new releases should be allowed to go over 1000 points. Does anybody feel the same about that or are you guys alright with paying GameStop-like prices for newer games? I didn't know Gamestop allowed you to buy games with Goozex points... *nom nom nom*
If you have to love one baby dinosaur chomping Goozex member, make it R2K! Excellent post!
R2K I like the new eating baby dinos tactic. That was making me pretty annoyed too.
Well, with the mod team locking all the redundant threads, I was getting a little hungry.
Of the 169 people who have voted for this 71.6% of them are against the change in it's current state, likely even more because the third option was added after the thread began. Such is the case of Kenny.
I-Weapon-X:Master debation
Say that ten times fast....
shoshokid: Of the 169 people who have voted for this 71.6% of them are against the change in it's current state, likely even more because the third option was added after the thread began. Such is the case of Kenny.
And Kenny is el-furioso!
Join the Goozex Pokerstars Club!
GreenManGaming
