Best FPS game of all time : Week 1-Bracket 2 .

Reply

Superman50 Posted: 09-20-2008 8:45 PM

rated by 0 users

Rules and Prologue

Ive decided to make a huge poll of the top fps's of all time .  This listing will consist of the top 20 greatest ( or atleast in many peoples opinions ) FPS'S of all time . NOTE ONLY 1 GAME PER FRANSHISE WILL BE PUT UP FOR VOTING ! . Each week we will be narrowing down the list until theres just one game left to share the glory all by himself . If all goes well then id love to make more of this for the future . It will be divided by brackets . Think of it as a tournament . Only 1 vote is allowed per bracket . I hope the peeps at goozex love this and we will continue to make more of these . So without further or do heres our 20 contestants . * apploud *

Bracket 2 -

Goldeneye 007

Halo

Perfect Dark

Timesplitters 2

Battfield 1942

Reply

Superman50 replied on 09-20-2008 8:48 PM

rated by 0 users

I chose goldeneye because it was just a cool game with an awsome multiplayer .

Reply

StarKnightX replied on 09-20-2008 9:16 PM

rated by 0 users

This one was a tough call. Battlefield I never played so thats out. Goldeneye I still feel has held up better than Perfect Dark , but I think both Halo and Timesplitters 2 are better games.

Out of those two , Timesplitters had better multiplayer than Halo , but Halo had a better Campaign. Between the two though I'm gonna have to give the nod to Halo , mainly cause it had a great campaign that I was excited to finish and went back to replay it in heroic and in legendary.

Reply

firenextdoor replied on 09-20-2008 9:17 PM

rated by 0 users

Halo. I wondered just what was so great about it all these years and it's just awesome.

I just recieved TimeSplitters 2 and I'm not enjoying it at all. And yes, I'm playing it co-op (supposedly the way it's supposed to be played).

Reply

Superman50 replied on 09-20-2008 9:23 PM

rated by 0 users

StarKnightX:

This one was a tough call. Battlefield I never played so thats out. Goldeneye I still feel has held up better than Perfect Dark , but I think both Halo and Timesplitters 2 are better games.

Out of those two , Timesplitters had better multiplayer than Halo , but Halo had a better Campaign. Between the two though I'm gonna have to give the nod to Halo , mainly cause it had a great campaign that I was excited to finish and went back to replay it in heroic and in legendary.

Reply

Superman50 replied on 09-20-2008 9:23 PM

rated by 0 users

firenextdoor:

Halo. I wondered just what was so great about it all these years and it's just awesome.

 

I just recieved TimeSplitters 2 and I'm not enjoying it at all. And yes, I'm playing it co-op (supposedly the way it's supposed to be played).

Reply

StarKnightX replied on 09-20-2008 9:35 PM

rated by 0 users

Superman50:

Aww man have you atleast played battfield 2 ? Its still a terrific game 3 years later .

Nope , never played any of the battlefield games. Never been much of a pc gamer , and even though battlefield 2 was on the 360 , I never was really too interested in getting it on the 360 since I figured the PC version would be better.

Reply

StarKnightX replied on 09-20-2008 9:38 PM

rated by 0 users

Superman50:

Well its a bit old now timesplitters 2 ... So it might not be as enjoyable as it was back then when it was really one of the best console shooters out .

All three Timesplitters games were excellent multiplayer affairs. Timesplitters 3 (Future Perfect) also had a respectable campaign mode though. Kinda a pity that Free Radical followed up the excellent Timesplitters series with Haze. Heres hoping that either Haze gets a sequel thats better , or that we eventually get a new Timesplitters.

Reply

Necromas replied on 09-21-2008 9:46 AM

rated by 0 users

I kind of feel sorry for Perfect Dark, it was basically the much improved sequel to Goldeneye, but since they didn't name it Goldeneye 2 it didn't get the attention it deserved. (talking about the N64 versions of course)

Reply

chris100185 replied on 09-21-2008 9:59 AM

rated by 0 users

Voted Perfect Dark. Amazing game. Fantastic Multi-player.

Reply

Tiny415 replied on 09-22-2008 4:58 PM

rated by 0 users

Battlefield 1942

I loved Goldeneye, and at one point was the University of Delaware Champ, but Battlefield was just a better game. I remember when it first came out, my graphics card did not support HT&L, so all I could see were grey models, with the exception of the skybox, and I still played for hours. Being able to drive the submarines, carriers, even the jeeps just seemed so amazing. Plus a good group of players would actually act as a team. Thinking about it now, makes me want to pop the disks back in and boot it up.

The others were amazing games as well, with the exception of Perfect Dark, but that is because I never got around to playing it. But, in the end, it all comes back to Battlefield 1942

Reply

Superman50 replied on 09-22-2008 5:15 PM

rated by 0 users

Tiny415:

Battlefield 1942

 

I loved Goldeneye, and at one point was the University of Delaware Champ, but Battlefield was just a better game. I remember when it first came out, my graphics card did not support HT&L, so all I could see were grey models, with the exception of the skybox, and I still played for hours. Being able to drive the submarines, carriers, even the jeeps just seemed so amazing. Plus a good group of players would actually act as a team. Thinking about it now, makes me want to pop the disks back in and boot it up.

 

The others were amazing games as well, with the exception of Perfect Dark, but that is because I never got around to playing it. But, in the end, it all comes back to Battlefield 1942

Reply

kube00 replied on 09-23-2008 12:18 AM

rated by 0 users

PD or Halo

Although Goldeneye showed us that consoles can do fps